[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Is Fedora Core slower than RH 9 ?



On Thursday 02 December 2004 13:33, steve_dum mentorg com wrote:
> While not quite the same comparison, I upgraded a RH 7.2 machine
> and found that overall the amount of memory required for an idle
> system with a gnome desktop open, increased by a factor of 4!
> My aging laptop had 77M of ram and 200M of swap space.  It ran

I (wife actually) used to run RHL 6.2 ona Pentium 133 with 64 Mbytes of RAM.

Now she has a Pentium III 550 with 256 Mb, I have an Athlon 1400 with 512 
Mbytes and plan on trebling it.




-- 

Cheers
John Summerfield
tourist pics: http://environmental.disaster.cds.merseine.nu/


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]