[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: MySQL stuck at 3.23?



What have you heard ?

I've been using 4.1.x for quite some time: 100,000,000+ records,
500 GB, etc etc. somedays over 2,000,000 inserts, 1,000,000 deletes.

The only thing I've heard about it being buggy is from a Oracle sales
moron.



On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 19:00, Tom Coburn wrote:
> besides, mysql 4 is buggy anyway I hear...
> not interested in PHP 5 either because I hear I would have to rewrite
> all my code for PHP 5,  esp in object oriented programs.  least thats
> what I hear anyway.
> 
> 
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 14:59:36 -0500, Matthew Miller <mattdm mattdm org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 07:35:55AM -0800, Mike Ramirez wrote:
> > > If you search the archives of the list you will fin that this question
> > > has been asked atleast 3 times and the answer is Licensing Issues.  4 is
> > > under a whole new licensing from mysql.  Redhat lawyers and mysql
> > > lawyers are still working out the details.  IDK of ETA on this.
> > 
> > MySQL 4.1.7 is in rawhide (the development tree) right now. So I assume we
> > figure Fedora Core 4 -- this spring -- as an ETA.
> > 
> > --
> > Matthew Miller           mattdm mattdm org        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
> > Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>
> > 
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list redhat com
> > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]