ATTN SELF-STYLED LIST POLICE (was RE: Mr. Day)
Thomas Cameron
thomas.cameron at camerontech.com
Tue Dec 7 06:59:58 UTC 2004
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 13:50 +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> Thank you Gene.
>
> I've never said more than "please post no HTML" and, when provoked then
> provided some reasons.
Then my post certainly wasn't directed at you. I think I made clear
over and over that I was talking to the people on this list who take a
"holier than thou," condescending or downright rude tone with newcomers.
> I am offended at the rudeness of people such as Thomas.
I am truly sorry if you are offended.
> There are many factors
> that go to _my_ choice of email client, and its ability to render HTML and
> Javascript does not rank. I chose one to suit _my_ requirements.
Great - I agree with your reasoning. I think that is the only way to
choose any tool. BUT - if 92-93% of the list uses MUAs which handle
HTML just fine, how is it reasonable that that 92-93% should change
their ways to support the 7-8% of the list members who voluntarily
choose to use an MUA which doesn't handle HTML?
Don't get me wrong - I personally don't like HTML mail, and I prefer
bottom posting. But I refuse to get all lathered up about it when some
new user top/HTML posts. I might shoot them a gentle explanation of
list etiquette. At worst I'll delete the message. But at no time will
I be publicly derogatory towards him/her. That hurts the community.
> I've been on RH lists off and on since Hurricane, and there are others I know
> have been around a long time too: Robert Day, Joe Klemmer, Jo Dow. Mike
> Harris used to be a regular too.
That's great. I admire you and them for being here a long time.
Longevity does not excuse being nasty. I've been on the Internet/Usenet
since 1996. It doesn't make it OK for me to be condescending to
newcomers.
> We help because we like to, and we keep it up because we're stupid.
Heh - I firmly believe the former and seriously doubt the latter.
> Always, the use of HTML has ranked amongst the less desirable things people
> do, that gets the most complaints: probably the silliest regular mistake is
> emailing to the list in order to be removed.
Yup. It gets frustrating, no doubt. All I am saying is, there is no
reason to blast a newbie for making an innocent mistake. Me, I know
I've stirred the pot, and I'll wade into the fray freely. But blasting
a newcomer is just flat wrong, and it hurts the community as a whole.
Thomas
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list