OT: HTML email (was: gnome desktop backround)
Sean
seanlkml at sympatico.ca
Tue Dec 7 10:05:49 UTC 2004
On Tue, December 7, 2004 4:56 am, Jon Haugsand said:
>> HTML is not a universal WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get)
>> HTML and the 'equivalent' text of a MIME message may not be equal
>> HTML can Carry mixed character sets unnoticed by the sender
>> - Why are any of these a concern?
>
> Because the message is read differently by different readers.
Yes, and my email reader may wrap text messages at different widths
than yours does. What does it matter?
> Local search becomes problematic. _My_ local search at least. My
> email agent doesn't like html.
Surely this isn't an insurmountable problem?
>> HTML facilitates spammers
>> HTML facilitates spyware
>> HTML rich content hobbles off line interaction.
>> - How? I receive HTML email from family members, no problem.
>
> Why is this an an issue?
I really don't know. That's why I asked how these points can be valid,
having seen no evidence of them myself even though many family members
choose to use HTML email.
> It is not. If html is banned in serious email, mailing lists and on
> the Usenet news, you could just filter out _all_ html and therefore
> illegal content without the risk.
>
Surely someone could still send you "illegal content" in a text message?
Proper filters can do the same job you're looking for with or without HTML
email messages.
Sean
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list