[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: public blacklists

Am Mi, den 08.12.2004 schrieb Mike Klinke um 18:21:

> > We did a paid study on the issue. The bottom line is that
> > greylisting is great for reducing spam but may be HORRIBLE in a
> > business environment.
> After having used it for the past 6 months or so in a small business 
> environment and having nothing but excellent results I'm interested 
> in how you arrived at your conclusion. Is this a problem of scale?
> Regards, Mike Klinke

Seem Red Hat now uses greylisting his own too. My last posting was
deferred and I saw following in my mail server's log:

Dec 10 03:55:18 noc sm-mta[34507]: iBA2t4kA034505:
to=<fedora-list redhat com>, delay=00:00:13, xdelay=00:00:12,
mailer=esmtp, pri=32357, relay=mx2.redhat.com. [],
dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: 451 4.7.1 greylisted for 21 minutes and 27


Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | new address - new key: 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon kernel 2.6.9-1.6_FC2smp 
Serendipity 04:20:55 up 4 days, 3:43, load average: 0.81, 1.43, 1.81 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]