General request .. Dismal performance of core 3 ..

[Andy Green]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 20 December 2004 17:31, Ed Hill wrote:

> In that spirit, could you describe which benchmarks you've run and what
> the results were?  For instance, what basis are you using to decide that
> FC3 is "almost twice as slow"?

Also the exact machine details it was tried on might be interesting, I would 
think.

- -Andy

- -- 
http://www.addintelligence.co.uk -- we design custom hardware and software for 
your products 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBxxAFjKeDCxMJCTIRAqKbAJ9ERBRQCOft6YWHNiN+Pr2c8iebGACfQLJQ
9Ca6BGUOLY0MnSi+dWMlbS4=
=RIiD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----