[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Fedora vs Tao vs CentOs as servers

On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 01:01, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 05:34:09PM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Ed Wilts wrote:
> > 
> > > I currently run Red Hat Professional Workstation as my home server.  I
> > > added a few packages from dag to complete what I need, recognizing, of
> > > course, that the dag packages are unsupported by Red Hat.
>                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > 
> > But they are supported by the community !
> And there is nothing wrong with that as long as we realize that we can't
> call Red Hat Support for calls on (say) ProFTPd.  I depend on several of
> your packages to survive (ProFTPd being one of them) and I very much
> appreciate your efforts.

I think I must be missing some emails. Didn't get the comments from Dag.

BTW, if you're reading this, I'm unsure how to determine which packages
are for Tao (though it's stated that you do have packages for it) eg:
Looking for Cacti, I saw only FC1/FC2/RHEL and no Tao.

Ow Mun Heng
Gentoo/Linux on D600 1.4Ghz 
98% Microsoft(tm) Free!!
Neuromancer 10:15:57 up 1:05, 5 users, 0.12, 0.21, 0.18 

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]