Suggestions for updating to a newer OpenSSL
Nick Gray
nick-lists at austin.rr.com
Wed Dec 29 11:34:10 UTC 2004
On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 19:15 -0700, James McKenzie wrote:
> Nick Gray wrote:
> > I think I remember what seems like a long time ago that if you updated
> > the version of OpenSSL 096?, that it wouldn't show when doing an rpm -q.
> > I think this was due to some library inconsistencies or something. And
> > even though I had installed later versions of SSL, I remember that you
> > couldn't remove the original version.
> >
> > I am looking for an rpm version of OpenSSL 097e. or a reasonably easy
> > way to replace what is installed with a post installation compatible
> > version.
> >
> > Suggestions?
> >
> Just compiled OpenSSL 0.9.7e. I would seriously recommend waiting for
> 0.9.7f due to problems with the build. Also, OpenSSL with FC3 is
> up-to-date.
>
James are you saying that they are doing the same thing that they used
to do, where they would update the code but not the rev #. The versions
on the site are
openssl-0.9.7a-40.i686.rpm and openssl096b-0.9.6b-19.i386.rpm
did you build the straight source or an src-rpm ?
> James McKenzie
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list