RedHat, Fedora future?

[Preston Crawford]

On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 08:48, David L Norris wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 15:50, Robin Laing wrote:
> > I like Fedora but I don't like that it doesn't follow the standards as 
> > laid down by the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 
> > <http://www.pathname.com/fhs/index.html>
> 
> How is Fedora violating FHS?  It might be helpful to enumerate one or
> more deficiencies instead of just saying "Naughty naughty Fedora doesn't
> follow standards."
> 
> I'd truly be interested to know because I don't see anything which
> obviously violates FHS.  A cursory glance would suggest that FC1 is
> completely FHS 2.2 compliant.
> 
> Also, LSB compliance in FC1 is provided by the redhat-lsb package.

Same here. I've used other distros that are very LSB-compliant (SuSE)
and Fedora seems just as good from what I can see.

Preston