RedHat, Fedora future?

[David L Norris]

On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 15:50, Robin Laing wrote:
> I like Fedora but I don't like that it doesn't follow the standards as 
> laid down by the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 
> <http://www.pathname.com/fhs/index.html>

How is Fedora violating FHS?  It might be helpful to enumerate one or
more deficiencies instead of just saying "Naughty naughty Fedora doesn't
follow standards."

I'd truly be interested to know because I don't see anything which
obviously violates FHS.  A cursory glance would suggest that FC1 is
completely FHS 2.2 compliant.

Also, LSB compliance in FC1 is provided by the redhat-lsb package.

-- 
 David Norris
  http://www.webaugur.com/dave/
  ICQ - 412039
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040205/982b5789/attachment-0001.sig>