Security updates are too slow or none existant

[Colin Charles]

On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 11:57, Bart Martens wrote:

> > Also, compairing one release to another doesn't make sense.  RHL 9 has had
> > kernel updates that FC 1 didn't need because it was already patched.
> 
> Are you denying the problem? Are you saying that fc1 is kept up to date
> just as fast as rh9?

It is just as fast.

> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh9-errata.html
> http://fedoranews.org/updates/

The fedoranews.org updates is created manually, so there might be a
delay in time from rh9's errata till the fedoranews.org updates feed
catches on.

There was a call for jobs (aka FedoraJobs) to get this fixed. Read:
	http://fedoranews.org/colin/fnu/week4.shtml

-- 
Colin Charles, byte at aeon.com.my
http://www.bytebot.net/
http://fedoranews.org/colin/fnu/ - Fedora News Updates