RH now exiting 1 more data center

[Res]

On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Joe Klemmer wrote:

> > > Slackware.  There's just to much missing from it.  I know it can do the
> > > job just fine but the maintenance of a Slack box is astronomical
> > > compared to any of the other distros.  You would probably be better
> >
> > actually no, its about the same as RH.
>
> 	On what planet?

On Earth lamer, we've run em both side by side, no more maint has had to
be given to the slackware boxes than any RH box.


> 	FC1 is as stable for servers as RH9 ever was.  The only disadvantage to
> Fedora on REAL servers is it's update cycle.  It will cost a lot more in

what rubbish, see my original post.


>
> 	I'm guessing that you did an upgrade from the 7.3 boxes to FC1.  That's

No! clean installs on both.

> 	FC1 is much more reliable and stable than RH8 ever dreamed it could
who said anything about 8? never used 8 at all.

> be.  And you must be forgetting about the 2.x, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x, 6.x days
> as well.  Fedora is not bullet proof.  Neither was RH9.  If you want

RH9 is bullet proof on the 3 RH9 boxes remaining.