Is SMP stability any better?
WipeOut
wipe_out at users.sourceforge.net
Thu Feb 26 18:16:05 UTC 2004
Ian Cameron wrote:
> Also in the 'not quite everyone crowd'...; definately not the latest h/w:
> Compaq Proliant 3000, 2x pIII 550, 3x 18.2Gb RAID
>
> Linux *hostname* 2.4.22-1.2149.nptlsmp #1 SMP Wed Jan 7 12:51:51 EST
> 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
> 11:49:08 up 33 days, 21:29, 2 users, load average: 0.03, 0.01, 0.00
> 85 processes: 84 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
> CPU states: cpu user nice system irq softirq iowait idle
> total 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 197.8%
> cpu00 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 98.6%
> cpu01 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.2%
> Mem: 643516k av, 631100k used, 12416k free, 0k shrd, 107148k buff
> 296520k active, 213236k inactive
> Swap: 2097096k av, 584k used, 2096512k free, 338052k cached
>
> Not under any real load, but have banged away at it off and on (vsftp
> and apache), have a couple of NFS mounts from another file server and
> a Samba share (for one day now). The box is in the data center so I
> have left root logged into the desktop (Gnome) with a terminal window
> and Mozilla open.
>
> This box is destined to take over http and ftp duties from a pII RH7.1
> (1:57pm up 195 days, 6:15, 3 users, load average: 0.18, 0.25,
> 0.10) eventually and as I push more users towards it to up the loading
> we'll see what happens. As far as the kernel and updates goes I will
> let it run as long as it is happy. This is a custom install somewhere
> between a server and workstation.
>
> ===========
> Ian Cameron
> Knoll, Inc
>
>
>
Is this system a minimum install with the specific software added on? or
is it a desktop or workstation install?
It seems minimum installs are stable which the others are not..
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list