Bind v. TinyDNS

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 13:20, WipeOut wrote:
> IIRC, his licence says that you can't re-distribute binary versions of 
> his software but it can be re-distributed as source..

DJB's license only allows pristine redistribution.

He considers the distribution of patches as somethings separate.

Everyone having to maintain a complex qmail MTA at an ISP usually has to
patch qmail with SEVERAL patches that _are_not_ going to ever be
integrated, easing most everyone's life.

Every time there an update on one patch, those admins suffer real pains
that could have been avoided if but Dan's arrogance allowed it.

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040104/d08b6652/attachment-0001.sig>