FC1 on the enterprise?

[Bevan Bennett]

Res wrote:

>
>I wouldnt use it in a samba file server for win$hit boxes, especially if
>you have a lot of them, we ran dual test, and the 7.3 boxes kicked fedora
>all over the place for speed, moved them to rh9 still going fine, fedora
>was laggy slow horrid, 
>
Do you have any more details availible on the tests you ran? (What test 
systems were used, how you created the test load, what the resulting 
measurements were, etc)

I'd really be quite interested, especially as I recently moved my samba 
from 7.3 to FC1.
It was just getting to be too annoying and painful for me to compile new 
software for the old systems...

>Oh and fedoras kbdrate setting is BS
>
kbdrate seems set to exactly the same defaults on RH8.0 as in FC1. 
What's BS about it? Does it not work as advertised?