Default Sendmail Configuration Changes?
Gerry Doris
gdoris at rogers.com
Thu Jan 29 14:45:30 UTC 2004
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 08:39, Henry Hartley wrote:
> I recently upgraded a server from RH9 to FC1 (via yum, which worked
> surprisingly well). One problem we've had is that the configuration format
> for Sendmail seems to have changed enough that we needed to go through that
> pretty thoroughly and update everything. One thing we still have not
> managed to get working correctly is the ability to send mail from local
> network clients. Clients can all read mail fine and by running pine or mutt
> on the server we can send mail without problems. But with Mozilla Mail
> (which is what our users mostly use) we are asked for a SMTP password and
> when it is provided, we are simply asked again, as though the password we
> provided were wrong (I'm pretty sure I'm getting it right). Has something
> changed in the default method for authenticating? Is this even a sendmail
> issue? Since we can READ mail without problems, I assume we can
> authenticate at some level (using IMAPS). Our iptables is allowing ports
> 993 and 465 through so I don't think that's the problem.
> Sendmail-cf-8.12.10-1.1.1 on FC1. Suggestions welcome.
>
> --
> Henry Hartley
I'm not sure what type of authentication you're using but I ran into a
similar problem after my upgrade. Fedora's version of sendmail uses
sasldb2 not sasldb (notice the "2" at the end).
sasldb2 is created in a different format than sasldb using the
saslpasswd2 utility. You can list users using sasldblistusers2. In
other words, your problem may be with sasl.
--
Gerry Doris <gdoris at rogers.com>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list