okay to disable lvm? reduces boot delay from dvd drives
Phil Dybvig
fedora at ducksoup.afree.net
Fri Jul 9 07:16:45 UTC 2004
Hi! I recently had a big slow-down in boot time. At first I assumed it was one
of the updates, but I am pretty sure now it was due to lvm and the fact that I
left music/vcds in the dvd drives. The delay was between mounting the root
partition and the swap space; looking at /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit I figured it was
due to lvm (logical volume management), whatever that is. In var/log/messages,
there were errors from the cd drives, sometimes few (2 each) and sometimes many
(corresponding to long delays in booting, so long that at first I always assumed
it was hung and did a hard reboot). Setting up verbose logging for lvm yielded
``no volume groups found'' so i figured it wasn't doing anything and I disabled
it by renaming /sbin/lvm.static to /sbin/lvm.static.bk. Then booting has been
fast and the /dev/hda and /dev/hdb errors from the cd drives disappeared.
All of this is good so far, but I want to ask to make sure that lvm isn't
something I will need later and do not want to disable. Also, out of curiosity,
what is lvm and when is it needed? The references to lvm on this list only say
that if you use lvm, you should not even think about using yum or apt to upgrade
from FC1 to FC2.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list