rpm or pam bug?

Edward edward at tripled.iinet.net.au
Sat Jul 24 03:33:46 UTC 2004



Thomas Zehetbauer wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> whenever I upgrade some packages for which there are i386 and x86_64
> versions installed the configuration files are created as .rpmnew or
> saved as .rpmsave files. Comparing these files almost always shows that
> they are identical.
> 
> rpm -q --queryformat '%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n' pam
> pam-0.77-50.x86_64
> pam-0.77-50.i386
> 
> warning: /etc/pam.d/other created as /etc/pam.d/other.rpmnew
> warning: /etc/security/access.conf created as /etc/security/access.conf.rpmnew
> warning: /etc/security/chroot.conf created as /etc/security/chroot.conf.rpmnew
> warning: /etc/security/console.perms created as /etc/security/console.perms.rpmnew
> warning: /etc/security/group.conf created as /etc/security/group.conf.rpmnew
> warning: /etc/security/limits.conf created as /etc/security/limits.conf.rpmnew
> warning: /etc/security/pam_env.conf created as /etc/security/pam_env.conf.rpmnew
> warning: /etc/security/time.conf created as /etc/security/time.conf.rpmnew
> 
> Tom

What's your question Tom? The above looks quite normal to me.

Regards,
Ed.






More information about the fedora-list mailing list