Next Fedora Release
tmolina at cablespeed.com
tmolina at cablespeed.com
Mon Jun 7 12:28:03 UTC 2004
On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 12:14:15 +0100
Andy Green <fedora at warmcat.com> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Monday 07 June 2004 11:54, K.M.Zammi Kahan wrote:
>> Hi,
>> My opinion on Fedora roadmap is , New version should be
>>released every six
>> months, yes every six months. >There's something to that idea.
>
>The six month thing just sounds like an arbitrary goal
>that is going to create
>unfinished releases, this time is was selinux, in the end
>it fell off the end
>of the world but in the meanwhile sucked up a lot of
>effort and maybe made
>the unfinishedness factor of FC2 worse than it could have
>been.
I agree that the six month thing may be an arbitrary goal.
However, I disagree with your assertion regarding
selinux. In my opinion Fedora Core (Test) is precisely
the right place for a project like selinux. It gets
sponsored by a major distributor, gets LOADS of testing,
and is a great feature. If you did a default install of
Fedora Core 2, selinux wasn't even enabled so it shouldn't
have been an issue.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list