libpnm.so.9 and xplanet

[Globe Trotter]

--- "Christopher K. Johnson" <ckjohnson at gwi.net> wrote:
> Globe Trotter wrote:
> 
> >I get the following: I am not sure what it means -- I am really confused
> >because netpbm is installed.
> >
> >
> >#   rpm -V $(rpm -qf $(which xplanet))
> >package /usr/local/bin/xplanet is not installed
> >package is is not installed
> >package not is not installed
> >package owned is not installed
> >package by is not installed
> >package any is not installed
> >package package is not installed
> >
> >  
> >
> $(which xplanet) yielded "/usr/local/bin/xplanet"
> $(rpm -qf /usr/local/bin/xplanet) yielded "/usr/local/bin/xplanet is not 
> owned by any package"
> So the final command was: rpm -V /usr/local/bin/xplanet is not owned by 
> any package
> Which of course tried to verify each whitespace delimited package name, 
> yeilding all the claims that those packages are not installed.
> 
> Looks like perhaps xplanet was not installed using rpm.  You will have 
> to provide more details about how you installed xplanet...
> 

No, I did. I must say that I had mistakenly used the rpm commands on the
.src.rpm as follows:

rpm -Uvh xplanet-maps-1.0-2.fr.src.rpm
rpm -Uvh xplanet-1.0.8-1.1.fc2.fr.src.rpm

the realizing what I had done, removed it, using:

rpm -e xplanet-maps
rpm -e xplanet

and then gone and installed the i386 rpms from freshrpms:

rpm -Uvh xplanet-1.0.8-1.1.fc2.fr.i386.rpm xplanet-maps-1.0-2.fr.noarch.rpm 
warning: xplanet-1.0.8-1.1.fc2.fr.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
e42d547b
Preparing...                ########################################### [100%]
   1:xplanet-maps           ########################################### [ 50%]
   2:xplanet                ########################################### [100%]

What should I do?

Many thanks, and best wishes!


		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail