2 points: dovecot & Fedora list

[Marc Lucke]

(1)  Dovecot:  I was very embarrassed indeed.  I read the dovecot site 
to find that it did not yet properly support mbox format.  How sad for 
me.  I switched back to uw-imapd & will wait until it supports mbox 
fully.  So at anytime I'm happy to be corrected, but isn't mbox the 
standard format in linux?  If so, & dovecot doesn't yet support mbox, 
then why should it be preferred for use over uw-imapd (leaving alone the 
fact that Fedora automatically knocked out my uw-imap & replaced it with 
cyrus-imapd all without any say from me!)

(2)  someone answered in a previous post suggesting all sorts of 
resources and mailing-lists I can subsribe to for non Fedora specific 
posts.  I thank that person for the information but point out that given 
fedora is made up of packages that have mailing-lists elsewhere, then 
what is the fedora list actually for?  Theoretically there should be no 
posts to the list at all!  Kernel problems -> kernel, dovecot issues -> 
dovecot etc.  The next point is this:  I didn't chose to move from 
uw-imapd.  I was quite happy with it.  Installing FC2 made that choice 
for me.  Is it therefore not relevant to point out any flaws about 
dovecot or ask questions to the fedora list?