FC2 to RH9
Ted Gervais
ve1drg at av.eastlink.ca
Thu Jun 24 14:20:49 UTC 2004
On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 11:17, Satish Balay wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Ted Gervais wrote:
>
> > Has anyone thought of going back to RH9? That release had virtually no
> > problems and while it was the last supported release it still is/was better
> > than the fedora distributions. I am thinking of the problems with the sound,
> > scanners, and other hardware devices and applications. I would have thought
> > that after FC1 that FC2 would have had all the current concerns fixed and it
> > would have been as good as RH9. Turns out, it is many steps behind the last
> > RedHat release and makes one wonder about continuing.
> >
> > Anyway - just wondering if others have had the same thought about going back
> > to what was better than the current FC2 release??
>
> FC1 -> FC2 was a major change
>
> 2.4 kernel -> 2..6 kernel
> OSS sound -> ALSA sound.
>
> If things don't work with FC2 to your satisfaction - stick arround
> with FC1. FC1 is an improvement over RHL9 - in your terms.
Yes. FC1 was an improvement over RH9, but FC2 was a disappointment. So
rather than go back to RH9, just drop back to FC1. I wonder if that is
possible??
>
> Satish
--
Ted Gervais
Coldbrook, Nova Scotia
Canada.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list