Why Would Fedora be Free ? Can it be Trusted?

[Rui Miguel Seabra]

On Sat, 2004-05-15 at 02:31 +0100, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 19:24 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> > Can you substantiate or in any way support that claim? What you or I 
> > *think* is rather irrelevant, but what I posted is directly sourced from 
> > several Red Hat engineers and managers and I consider it a fact.
> > 
> > You keep saying "I think," "I don't think," and "it might." Kindly stick to 
> > facts: what do you *know* about this topic? Can you provide *any* evidence 
> > whatsoever that backs up your statements?
> 
> What, you mean that community provided and tested software collections
> isn't enough to tell you the process isn't the very same one?
> 
> Do you have any installation of RHEL?

Note that I'm not commenting on the quality, but that there are
evidently different procedures. I personally prefer a more relaxed one,
but saying that FC and RHEL follow the same procedures is putting it
quite mildy :)

Rui
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040515/f6d8a189/attachment-0001.sig>