Problems getting 2 NICs to work.

[Kevin Kimmell]

Ah... rc.local... thanks.

Here are the results that you asked to see. I'm still quite curious as 
to how this is actually working.

[root at dtweb02 sysconfig]# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use 
Iface
12.168.88.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth0
204.117.218.0   0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     0      0        0 eth0
127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0       U     0      0        0 lo
0.0.0.0         12.168.88.254   0.0.0.0         UG    0      0        0 eth0

[root at dtweb02 sysconfig]# ip route list
12.168.88.0/24 dev eth0  scope link
204.117.218.0/24 dev eth0  scope link
127.0.0.0/8 dev lo  scope link
default via 12.168.88.254 dev eth0

[root at dtweb02 sysconfig]# ip address list
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
4: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:0e:7f:30:52:53 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 12.168.88.12/24 brd 12.168.88.255 scope global eth0
    inet 204.117.218.12/24 brd 204.117.218.255 scope global eth0
5: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:0e:7f:30:52:52 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

And I couldn't get that last command to run. I tried ifcfg-ethX and 
ifcfg-eth0 and ifcfg-eth01 but all commands were not found. Perhaps 
they're not in the path?

++ Kevin Kimmell + kevin_AT_dynamictrend.com + Dynamic Trend, Inc. ++



Alexander Dalloz wrote:

>Am Di, den 18.05.2004 schrieb Kevin Kimmell um 00:12:
>
>  
>
>>Where should I be placing the default route statement so it survives reboot?
>>    
>>
>
>Delete all GATEWAY settings in 
>/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX and use instead
>/etc/sysconfig/network with GATEWAY for the default gateway and
>/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-ethX for the net specific routes. I
>pointed you already to
>
>http://www.akadia.com/services/redhat_static_routes.html
>
>Did that not help?
>
>  
>
>>Also, how is it that this is working since you didn't think it could?
>>    
>>
>
>Could you post:
>a) route -n
>b) ip route list
>c) ip addr list
>d) ifcfg-ethX
>
>  
>
>>Did I leave out that the two ISPs live on the same switch plane on my 
>>publis network? That should allow for separate net segments over the 
>>same card since neither one has a gateway.
>>
>>I checked it from traces and pings at an external source and it's working...
>>
>>Thanks and WTF???????
>>    
>>
>
>Can't say.
>
>Alexander
>
>
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040518/97d6a4d3/attachment-0001.htm>