Thoughts and Questions On Yum, Up2Date. Etc.
Tom 'Needs A Hat' Mitchell
mitch48 at sbcglobal.net
Tue May 25 21:58:11 UTC 2004
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 02:22:09PM -0400, billg wrote:
....
> Yum was very, very slow. If I didn't know better, as a new user might
> not, I would've assumed that it had crashed.
....
> 1) Is yum's unresponsiveness due to mirror load? If so, why wasn't
> up2date slow? Just dumb luck? Do they not look at the same
> repositories?
Mirror load is the issue. May 20 was in the peak download of FC2. Add
to this a slight bit of confusion because of dynamic mirror selection.
If you watch up2date you will see dynamic mirror selection. Some are
silly. With a default config I saw a connection to a small European
site that was slow. Killed it (I am in California) and on restart it
connected to a US mirror and the update went quickly.
I suspect that some sort of smarts needs to be invented for improved
locality. If I understood this better I could file an enhancement
request. Perhaps a cookie could pass time zone info
$ date +" %z"
-0700
Add N or S for hemisphere...
-0700N
Simple arithmetic can then look for a match. If no match then widen the
search +/- 1,2,3,5,both NS,8,13, any).
--
T o m M i t c h e l l
/dev/null the ultimate in secure storage.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list