RPMS.at-good and RPMS.at-stable

[Axel Thimm]

On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:11:49AM +0100, eric tanguy wrote:
> > eric tanguy wrote:
> >> What's the difference between these 2 repo ?
> >
> > Sorry, misread the question last time.
> >
> > The difference is explained at the bottom of http://atrpms.net/
> >
> > Paul.
> So if i understand well all packages from at-stable are included in
> at-good (maybe with newer version) ?

Yes, less stable repos contain all of their more stable counterparts:

good contains stable
testing contains good and stable
bleeding contains testing, good and stable

So you only need one of them. It doesn't really hurt to have more
repos activated though (only takes more time for the updating).
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20041130/a1998a2b/attachment-0001.sig>