OpenOffice Update RPM vs. Installer (was Re: OpenOffice upgrade fails - bad gpg signature)
David Cary Hart
Fedora at TQMcube.com
Tue Oct 26 17:39:27 UTC 2004
On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 13:26, James Mckenzie wrote:
> I will not disagree with your comment. However, the download for OO
> is still very large.
The RPMs are larger.
> Also, if I remember correctly, OO wants to install to /opt/bin and the
> default for FC2 is /usr/bin or /usr/lib.
The installer allows you to install to the directory of your choice.
Your point is well taken. On reflection, consider my post as an
alternative rather than a preference. I just wanted to make it clear
that installing OO from the org files does not require a Linux style
compilation which some people find daunting.
> You might end up with two different versions of OO installed on your
> system. Again, I might be incorrect about the install directory for
> OO. In any case, he needs to get the complete program or the
> installation might end up 'broken' or taking an extremely long time.
> This is also another good reason to order the upgrade on CD if it is
> available, or having a friend burn a CD for you if their connection is
> better than yours.
>
> James McKenzie
> Looking forward to November 8th for more than one reason.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list