Replies as attachments on this list...

Mon Sep 6 13:07:58 UTC 2004

Andrea Giuliano wrote:
> I'm using Mozilla 1.7.2, and I don't see GPG signatures in most of the 
> posts I checked. For instance, all posts from Alexander Dalloz don't 
> appear to have a GPG signature. I've also look at the full source of the 
> messages, but I couldn't find a signature.
> 
> Let's take an actual example: look at the only one "Re: Changing Console 
> Resolution!" by Alexander and the only one "Re: How do I Maintain hard 
> disk healthI" by fredex.

Here's the raw message for that posting as it arrived at my server:

 From fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com  Fri Sep  3 01:12:05 2004
Return-Path: <fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com>
Received: from hormel.redhat.com (hormel.redhat.com [209.132.177.30])
         by goalkeeper.city-fan.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i830C3Sl004843
         for <paul at city-fan.org>; Fri, 3 Sep 2004 01:12:04 +0100
Received: from listman.util.phx.redhat.com (listman.util.phx.redhat.com 
[10.8.4.110])
         by hormel.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
         id 9648C72EBC; Thu,  2 Sep 2004 20:11:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com
         [172.16.52.254])
         by listman.util.phx.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
         i830BsxO009531 for <fedora-list at listman.util.phx.redhat.com>;
         Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:55 -0400
Received: (from mail at localhost)
         by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i830Bs915859
         for fedora-list at listman.util.phx.redhat.com;
         Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:54 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31])
         by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i830Bs315855
         for <fedora-list at redhat.com>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:54 -0400
Received: from mx0.connactivity.com (mx0.connactivity.com [66.112.160.20])
         by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i830BpS0032632
         for <fedora-list at redhat.com>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:54 -0400
Received: from fcshome.stoneham.ma.us (5585-159-015.158.popsite.net
         [66.217.159.15])
         by mx0.connactivity.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i830BiZ28666
         for <fedora-list at redhat.com>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:45 -0400
Received: from fcshome.stoneham.ma.us (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
         by fcshome.stoneham.ma.us (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
         i830BhWs006314
         for <fedora-list at redhat.com>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:43 -0400
Received: (from fredex at localhost)
         by fcshome.stoneham.ma.us (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i830Bhg1006312
         for fedora-list at redhat.com; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:43 -0400
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:11:43 -0400
From: fredex <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us>
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20040903001143.GA6280 at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us>
Mail-Followup-To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
References: <20040902153406.24319.qmail at webmail-2-5.mesa1.secureserver.net>
         <1094140046.12730.15.camel at voyager.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1094140046.12730.15.camel at voyager.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0
X-loop: fedora-list at redhat.com
Subject: Re: How do I Maintain hard disk health
X-BeenThere: fedora-list at redhat.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: junk
Reply-To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
List-Id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>,
         <mailto:fedora-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archives/fedora-list>
List-Post: <mailto:fedora-list at redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:fedora-list-request at redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>,
         <mailto:fedora-list-request at redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1848291613=="
Sender: fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com
Errors-To: fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com
Received-SPF: pass (goalkeeper.city-fan.org: domain of redhat.com designates 
209.132.177.30 as permitted sender) receiver=goalkeeper.city-fan.org; 
client-ip=209.132.177.30; helo=hormel.redhat.com; 
envelope-from=fedora-list-bounces at redhat.com; x-software=spfmilter 0.93 
http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/;

--===============1848291613==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
         protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2"
Content-Disposition: inline

--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 10:47:26AM -0500, Steve Bergman wrote:
 > Well, there's SMARTD.  I haven't used it.  I'm thinking about starting
 > though. =20
 >=20
 > It used to be that IDE hard drive failures were a rarity.  In the last
 > couple of months or so, I've seen 3 drives die.  One was a couple months
 > old. (hitachi deskstar 61GB) The other two were 2 years old.
 > Interestingly, they were both Western Digital 20GB drives in a hardware
 > raid1 configuration.  They failed within a couple of weeks of each
 > other.  They both show to be dead even when put into a totally different
 > machine, and new drives in the original machine fixed the problems, so I
 > don't think its a controller issue.
 >=20
 > In my own personal machines, I have always used Maxtors and never had a
 > single failure, though.
 >=20
 > Anyone having similar experiences?

We've got a bunch of maxtors around here, and there are also a bunch
at work. So far this year I've seen 4 or 5 of 'em die within the 3-year
warranty (note that their warranty is now 1 year on most drives), though
there are several more approaching 3 years that are still humming along.

 >=20
 > On Thu, 2004-09-02 at 08:34 -0700, Michael Marsh wrote:
 > > Help!
 > >=20
 > > I run fedora as a samba server and have just recovered from my second
 > > hard disk crash in only 8 months.  Is there a way that i can monitor
 > > and fix hard disk health between disasters? > >=20 >=20
 >=20
 >=20
 > --=20
 > fedora-list mailing list
 > fedora-list at redhat.com
 > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

--=20
---- Fred Smith -- fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us --------------------------=
---
   "And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Fathe=
r,
   Prince of Peace. Of the increase of his government there will be no end. =
He=20
  will reign on David's throne and over his kingdom, establishing and uphold=
ing
       it with justice and righteousness from that time on and forever."
------------------------------- Isaiah 9:7 (niv) --------------------------=
----

--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBN7a/wkl39+p0CJ4RAopFAJ9KERhjUe2mUoRA2Y0sB46QAfpD8gCfXLuJ
cLFEH+POqMvJBh6YhL/xNtI=
=vt0H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2--

--===============1848291613==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list at redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

--===============1848291613==--

                                                   > I don't see a signature 
there, even looking at
> the sources. If you see a signature there instead, something here is 
> going wrong, from my glasses down to our mail server...
> 
> Really hope it's not my glasses' fault, I changed them last week!!!

Perhaps there's still time to get the glasses replaced? ;-)

Cheers, Paul.