Evolution 2.0

[Ted Kaczmarek]

On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 06:45, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 11.09.2004, 19:26 +1000 schrieb Colin Charles:
> [...]
> 
> > Also, since Fedora Core is at the cutting edge of development, should we
> > be wasting developer time on backporting Evo 2.0 for FC2, when we can
> > make it better for FC3?
> > 
> > Of course, if you or anyone else would like to take on such a task,
> > there's always room for such thing
> 
> Sometimes I think this is something we need. IMHO there are a lot of
> people that like to use/try/beta-test new program versions but don't
> want the use rawhide. I'm sometimes one of those cause the downloads are
> to heavy for me at home cause I have a volume based Internet account.
> 
> [skipping some length description with details, pro and contra arguments
> and the description on the current situation (people.redhat.com, new kde
> version at kde.org and so forth). If there is interest in this I can
> post these sort of things, but I think we should discuss this then
> directly at fedora-devel]
> 
> I would volunteer to do such "backporting" from rawhide to current Core-
> Version, but currently fedora has no place for this and I don't want to
> open an own repository ;-) I brought this on fedora-devel some months
> ago, but there was not much interest then. Maybe we should wait for the
> new build-system and bring it on topic then again.
> -- 
> Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora at leemhuis.info>
I thought "rawhide" was replaced with "development". The mirrors I have
been using don't even have a rawhide dir anymore.

What mirror can one fine the 2.0 evolution beta rpms and srpms?

Ted