ghost libGL?
Alexander Dalloz
ad+lists at uni-x.org
Mon Apr 25 20:03:40 UTC 2005
Am Mo, den 25.04.2005 schrieb Ashley M. Kirchner um 21:40:
> These days FC3 tells me that there's one update available,
> kdeartwork. When I try to install it, it tells me that libGL.so is
> needed. Problem is, it is installed. In two places, /usr/lib/ and
1) I don't see a kdeartwork update package actually.
2) Sure it requires libGL.so and not libGL.so.1? I would wonder if it is
first as the .so files are needed for development.
$ rpm -qp --requires kdeartwork-3.3.1-1.i386.rpm | grep libGL
libGL.so.1
libGLU.so.1
> /usr/X11R6/lib/. What has me baffled though is that if I run this:
>
> rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/lib/libGL.so
>
> It tells me that file isn't owned by any packages. However, if I do
Maybe coming from a third party graphics driver like NVidia or ATI?
> this:
>
> rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/lib/libGL.so.1
>
> Then it tells me what provides it just fine. So, having those files
> on the system, why does kdeartwork fail to update?
Please be specific about which kdeartwork RPM you are speaking.
> Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:ashley at pcraft.com> . 303.442.6410 x130
Alexander
--
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.14_FC2smp
Serendipity 21:58:25 up 13 days, 18:38, load average: 0.85, 0.48, 0.33
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050425/a0b18bb9/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list