Choosing YUM Repositories
Timothy Murphy
tim at birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
Sat Aug 6 11:26:33 UTC 2005
Ping-Wu Zhang wrote:
> I have heard that it is not a good idea to mix YUM repositories
> belonging to different "camps". Apparently, there are two camps which
> should not be commingled:
>
> 1. The default Fedora extra + Livna
> 2. Everyone else (including dag, Freshrpms, etc.)
>
> Can someone tell me why you choose one camp over another? I
> understand this question may turn into a flame bait. But b/c this is
> a very important issue, I apologize for advance. & I believe most of
> us are mature enough to make own decisions. Thanks.
I realise this is a minority view,
and I am no sort of expert,
but I would not include livna with the Fedora repositories.
I would have two classes:
1. The 3 standard Fedora repositories (core, updates and extras); and
2. All the rest.
I would include all the repositories in /etc/yum.repos.d/
but with "enabled=0" for the non-standard ones.
Then if I wanted something eg in livna I would run
"yum --enablerepo=livna install ...".
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list