Content Management

[Marc M]

wordpress.org <http://wordpress.org>

WP rocks; easier to set up than Mambo and the php-whatever ones. Also I 
setup mambo at my hosing company and they said it would require an upgrade 
since it requires a dedicated server, only runs with certain apache 
versions, etc. WP is very very light on the other hand, great for blogging 
and CMS. 

My site is forensiclug.com <http://forensiclug.com>

Marc


On 8/10/05, Ezra Nugroho <enugroho at spikesource.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> There is a great review tools in http://www.cmsmatrix.org/
> 
> I think if you are php person, go for Mambo. If you are a perl person go
> with webgui.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 20:32 +0530, Manish Kathuria wrote:
> > Thierry Sayegh wrote:
> > > Thiago Amaury Ferraz wrote:
> >
> > >>Someone knows some good content manager like/else PHP-Nuke? Could say
> > >>the URL!? I know Typo3, but it is much complex, and the Nuke.. now, it
> > >>is not so free..
> > >
> > > Have a look at http://www.opensourcecms.com/
> > > I think it's what you are after in the end
> > > hth
> > > Thierry
> > >
> >
> > Can someone suggest a good Content Management System which is
> > appropriate for a directory of web sites and URLs ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Manish
> >
> 
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050810/11c411c5/attachment-0001.htm>