vulnerability of Linux

[Mike McCarty]

Craig White wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 16:14 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> 
>>Christofer C. Bell wrote:
>>
>>>On 11/29/05, John Summerfied <debian at herakles.homelinux.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Christofer C. Bell wrote:
>>>>
>>
>>>It's ok that a few folks have issues, that's to be expected.  The vast
>>>vast vast majority have no issues whatsoever doing daily automatic
>>>updates.  *Your* story is anecdotal, not the norm.  It's your
>>>experience that isn't relavent to most people, not mine.
>>>
>>>*shrugs*
>>>
>>>--
>>
>>This thread is about to reach critical mass where people
>>start calling each other Nazi.
> 
> ----
> you are obviously referring to Godwin's law and not paying attention to

Yes.

> the part about...

No.

> "It is considered poor form to arbitrarily raise such a comparison with
> the motive of ending the thread."
> 
> Craig
> 

I'm not trying to end the thread. I'm making an observation only.
I don't like playing netcop.

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!