GAH! Kernel release 2.6.14-1.1653_FC4 caused me problems!

Martin Marques martin at bugs.unl.edu.ar
Thu Dec 15 10:39:29 UTC 2005


On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Sam Varshavchik wrote:

> Daniel B. Thurman writes:
>
>> I have everything installed in a single large partition.  Why is it,
>> that this was not a problem in the previous releases until now?  Why
>
> Because your previous kernels' images happen to exist on the disk below the 
> BIOS server's limit.
>
>> the requirement that /boot be in it's own partition?  This makes no
>> real sense to me
>
> That makes perfect sense.  This is the only way to guarantee that the 
> individual files on those partitions will not fall outside of the 
> BIOS-imposed limit.

OK, I just got stunned by this. I'm not making /boot partitions since I 
started using grub. I always that the grub could manage anyway with 
kernels installed beyond the cylinder 1024.

How bad am I without /boot partition on a, say, P4 Xeon on an Intel 
motherboard (bought a couple on months ago) with 2 SATA discs of 200GB?

--
  18:02:25 up 4 days,  9:57,  5 users,  load average: 1.59, 1.57, 1.62
---------------------------------------------------------
Lic. Martín Marqués         |   SELECT 'mmarques' || 
Centro de Telemática        |       '@' || 'unl.edu.ar';
Universidad Nacional        |   DBA, Programador,
     del Litoral             |   Administrador
---------------------------------------------------------


More information about the fedora-list mailing list