Failed deps qt

Paul Howarth paul at city-fan.org
Tue Feb 1 17:47:42 UTC 2005


James Wilkinson wrote:
> Bernd Radinger wrote:
> 
>>and that's littlecms -> pre-extras
>>
>>better get the src.rpm and rebuild it - if it fails because it wants
>>old qt2, see whether you find a qt2 src.rpm, redhat 9 or so came with
>>it
> 
> 
> qt2-devel*.rpm, surely? Something like
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/9/en/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/qt2-devel-2.3.1-13.i386.rpm
> or
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/9/en/os/i386/RedHat/RPMS/qt-devel-3.1.1-6.i386.rpm
> 
> (When compiling a src.rpm, you don't need all the source to its
> requisites, which is what the qt2 src.rpm would (partly) give. You just
> need the headers and anything else the -devel RPMs would give. And the
> src.rpm you're recompiling, of course.)

*-devel RPMs invariably have dependencies on their base libraries, e.g. 
qt2-devel would require qt2 (otherwise there would be no library to link 
to) so you'd have to install that as well. Hopefully it wouldn't 
conflict with the current qt package.

Paul.

P.S. OK, a -devel package could be self-contained if it had a static 
library and you linked to that library, but that's unusual.




More information about the fedora-list mailing list