Slightly OT: Greylisting another take
Paul Howarth
paul at city-fan.org
Fri Feb 18 16:15:00 UTC 2005
Alexander Volovics wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 03:46:25PM +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
>
>>Alexander Volovics wrote:
>
>
>>>>Ah, there were spammers on @home which resulted in whole sale black
>>>>listing. Now that does happen. Also a lot of email admins will block
>>>>dynamic IP address ranges. If you happen to be trying to run an email
>>>>server from a dynamic IP address (even if your assigned address has not
>>>>changed in years) a large part of the Internet will not accept SMTP
>>>>connections from you. In that case you just need to route your email
>>>>through your ISPs SMTP servers. Not much else you can do about that.
>
>
>>>The problem is I *am* routing my email through my ISPs SMTP server!
>
>
>
>>No, you're not. At least you're sending mail to this mailing list
>>directly from your own machine (cm10703-a.maast1.lb.home.nl
>>[84.30.68.3]) to Red Hat's MX hosts, not via any smarthost:
>
>
>
>>Received: from cm10703-a.maast1.lb.home.nl (cm10703-a.maast1.lb.home.nl
>> [84.30.68.3])
>> by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1IFgvvu021330
>> for <fedora-list at redhat.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:42:57 -0500
>>Received: by af.ever.maas (Postfix, from userid 500)
>> id C7446140FEB; Fri, 18 Feb 2005 16:46:37 +0100 (CET)
>
>
> Yes, I am!
> This is probably due to my postfix main.cf setup which contains
> the line: "smtp_helo_name = cm10703-a.maast1.lb.home.nl"
>
> I did this to keep all traces of my home network out of the headers.
> Maybe I should rethink this.
The top Received: line above shows mx1.redhat.com receiving a connection
from 84.30.68.3; is that your IP or your ISP's smarthost's IP? My
money's on the former.
Paul.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list