[OT] Re: FC3 sucks. It takes up too much memory!

[Edward Yang]

Mitsuho Iizuka wrote:

>From: Amy M <amymom at hawaiilinux.us>
>Subject: Re: [OT] Re: FC3 sucks. It takes up too much memory!
>Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:41:35 -1000
>
>  
>
>>(3)  While Windows can be very snappy when fresh, it is notorios for 
>>showing gravely deteriorated performance after time, especially after 
>>you have installed a number of applications.  With FC, thanks largely to 
>>the free upgrades, its performace actually goes up with time.
>>    
>>
>
>  * Just curious, Windows still deploys all on memory or swap style
>    virtual memory management other than paging on demand style.
>    (excuse me if i'm wrong)
>
>  
>
No that is not true. Though I am not an expert on Windows internals, but 
I do know that Windows memory management utilizes both physical memory 
and paging memory.

>  * FC1 was a little bit faster ;-(
>  
>
Yah! I quite agree with that.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050127/f20114a3/attachment-0001.htm>