[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: WARNING:DO NOT UPGRADE TO CORE 4



At 1:03 AM -0500 7/12/05, Mike McCarty wrote:
>Ken Rambler wrote:
>
>> I'm sorta the new FC kid on the block and a little confused. The last
>> version I used was RH9, very stable. How does FC3 and FC4 compare?
>> Which would be best for a production server?
>>
>> All these comments have me on guard :-)
>>
>>     -----Original Message-----
>>     *From:* fedora-list-bounces redhat com
>>     [mailto:fedora-list-bounces redhat com] *On Behalf Of *Fred Morcos
>>     *Sent:* Monday, July 11, 2005 8:28 PM
>>     *To:* For users of Fedora Core releases
>>     *Subject:* Re: WARNING:DO NOT UPGRADE TO CORE 4
>>
>>     well, im not against steven, fc3 is way much better than fc4.. i
>>     still experience hell a lot of problems in fc4 even after
>>     upgrading the whole system.. i dont know why all this happened, is
>>     it such bad testing? or the fedora team giving up on the project??
>>     things/problems that happen aren't suppose to be happening.. i
>>     mean, fedora core 4 till now cant be a usable system anywhere
>>     (home, office, server, etc..)
>>     no offence but i think that fc4 needs a lot more attention for the
>>     next 2 months to get everything tested, fixed and optimized as
>>     good as possible...
>>     im wishing them good luck
>>     -fred
>>
>Are these short lines? They sure got rewrapped for me.

No, /those/ were "long lines" in the original messages from Ken & Fred,
unlike the other messages you've cited.  They're also both HTML, while the
other messages you've complained about that I've checked have not been
HTML, dunno what that means.
____________________________________________________________________
TonyN.:'                       <mailto:tonynelson georgeanelson com>
      '                              <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]