Pb whith openldap on fedora core2
franklin dibus
franklinn2002 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 19 16:37:01 UTC 2005
Hi!
after installing my openldap and start it,I don´t know why it reply:
ldapsearch -x -D ¨dc=manager,dc=miage,dc=dla¨ -w secret -b ¨¨ -s base
¨objectClass=*¨ namingContexts
ldap_bind: Can't contact LDAP server (81)
I need your help
when I performed this command above
2005/7/19, fedora-list-request at redhat.com <fedora-list-request at redhat.com>:
> Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
> fedora-list at redhat.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> fedora-list-request at redhat.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> fedora-list-owner at redhat.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Weird high load on server (nodata)
> 2. Linux-NTFS Write Capability (Reuben D. Budiardja)
> 3. Re: Finally .... Palm pilot now synchronises (Steven W. Orr)
> 4. Re: Linux-NTFS Write Capability (Michael A. Peters)
> 5. Re: SELinux update error (Daniel J Walsh)
> 6. addon applications with Fedora 4 - success and failure
> (RLLOYDNAVE123 at wmconnect.com)
> 7. Re: IBM Blade Server HS20 with FC4 (Drew from Zhrodague)
> 8. Re: SELinux update error (Daniel J Walsh)
> 9. Re: Palm sync USB trouble FC3 (Martin, AA6E)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:15:49 +0200 (CEST)
> From: "nodata" <fedora at nodata.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: Weird high load on server
> To: "Dan Track" <dan.track at gmail.com>
> Cc: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <52038.213.164.3.90.1121786149.squirrel at www.nodata.co.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
> > On 7/19/05, nodata <fedora at nodata.co.uk> wrote:
> >> > On 7/19/05, nodata <fedora at nodata.co.uk> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi Guys,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Hope you experts can help me out here.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Basically I have server running at a very high load 2.44, although
> >> >> > nothing is noticably high when using top. There aren't any
> >> processes
> >> >> > running on the box except the standard linux OS tools. This box is
> >> >> > used for backup, and only becomes active during the night.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Its a compaq dl380 with a raid 5 configuration.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Can anyone suggest what I can do to find out why the load is high?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks for your help in advance.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Dan
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> I bet you have hanging nfs mounts.
> >> >> If the box is constantly at a load of around 2.44, and isn't
> >> sluggish, I
> >> >> wouldn't worry.
> >> >>
> >> >> Look at iostat, sar, etc. to find out why the load is like that.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > I've looked at these but can't see anything. The server doesn't mount
> >> > or export any filesystems using nfs or any other protocol. If it helps
> >> > here are the various outputs:
> >> >
> >> > uptime
> >> > 14:45:49 up 62 days, 43 min, 2 users, load average: 1.46, 1.57,
> >> 1.59
> >> >
> >> > sar 5 10
> >> > Linux 2.4.21-27.0.4.ELsmp (orion.gs.moneyextra.com) 19/07/05
> >> >
> >> > 14:46:02 CPU %user %nice %system %idle
> >> > 14:46:07 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
> >> > 14:46:12 all 0.00 0.00 0.10 99.90
> >> > 14:46:17 all 0.00 0.00 0.10 99.90
> >> > 14:46:22 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
> >> > 14:46:27 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
> >> > 14:46:32 all 0.00 0.00 0.10 99.90
> >> > 14:46:37 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
> >> > 14:46:42 all 0.10 0.00 0.31 99.59
> >> > 14:46:47 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
> >> > 14:46:52 all 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
> >> > Average: all 0.01 0.00 0.06 99.93
> >> >
> >> > vmstat -a
> >> > procs memory swap io system
> >> > cpu
> >> > r b swpd free inact active si so bi bo in cs us
> >> sy
> >> > wa id
> >> > 0 0 0 15404 189668 202836 0 0 3 1 0 2 3
> >> 4
> >> > 1 3
> >> >
> >> > free -m
> >> > total used free shared buffers
> >> cached
> >> > Mem: 498 483 15 0 128
> >> 301
> >> > -/+ buffers/cache: 53 445
> >> > Swap: 1027 0 1027
> >> >
> >> > iostat
> >> > Linux 2.4.21-27.0.4.ELsmp (orion.gs.moneyextra.com) 19/07/05
> >> >
> >> > avg-cpu: %user %nice %sys %idle
> >> > 3.11 0.00 3.72 93.17
> >> >
> >> > Device: tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn
> >> > /dev/ida/c0d0 19.68 427.93 279.15 2147483647 1400883506
> >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p1
> >> > 0.00 0.22 0.00 1087144 8986
> >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p2
> >> > 0.65 3.72 10.24 18680778 51401528
> >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p3
> >> > 0.00 0.00 0.00 248 0
> >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p4
> >> > 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0
> >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p5
> >> > 0.74 3.90 6.88 19570498 34517568
> >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p6
> >> > 0.00 0.00 0.00 168 0
> >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p7
> >> > 0.00 0.00 0.00 168 0
> >> > /dev/ida/c0d0p8
> >> > 18.29 427.93 262.03 2147483647 1314955424
> >> >
> >> > top
> >> > 14:47:51 up 62 days, 45 min, 2 users, load average: 1.73, 1.61,
> >> 1.59
> >> > 61 processes: 60 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
> >> > CPU states: cpu user nice system irq softirq iowait
> >> idle
> >> > total 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
> >> 99.5%
> >> > cpu00 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
> >> 99.0%
> >> > cpu01 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
> >> 100.0%
> >> > Mem: 510400k av, 495224k used, 15176k free, 0k shrd,
> >> 132000k
> >> > buff
> >> > 203040k actv, 182824k in_d, 6852k in_c
> >> > Swap: 1052592k av, 0k used, 1052592k free
> >> 308668k
> >> > cached
> >> >
> >> > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU
> >> COMMAND
> >> > 13100 root 20 0 1092 1092 888 R 0.4 0.2 0:00 0 top
> >> > 1 root 15 0 512 512 452 S 0.0 0.1 1:18 0 init
> >> > 2 root RT 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 0
> >> > migration/0
> >> > 3 root RT 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 1
> >> > migration/1
> >> > 4 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 1
> >> keventd
> >> > 5 root 34 19 0 0 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 0
> >> > ksoftirqd/0
> >> > 6 root 34 19 0 0 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 1
> >> > ksoftirqd/1
> >> > 9 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 0
> >> bdflush
> >> > 7 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 70:21 0
> >> kswapd
> >> > 8 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 23:07 1
> >> kscand
> >> > 10 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 3:30 0
> >> kupdated
> >> > 11 root 25 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 0
> >> > mdrecoveryd
> >> > 18 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 0
> >> ahc_dv_0
> >> > 19 root 25 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 0
> >> > scsi_eh_0
> >> > 23 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 2:30 1
> >> > kjournald
> >> > 192 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 0
> >> > kjournald
> >> > 193 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 13:57 1
> >> > kjournald
> >> > 194 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 4:18 0
> >> > kjournald
> >> > 568 root 15 0 576 576 492 S 0.0 0.1 0:57 0
> >> syslogd
> >> > 572 root 15 0 472 472 408 S 0.0 0.0 0:00 1
> >> klogd
> >> > 582 root 15 0 452 452 388 S 0.0 0.0 5:33 1
> >> > irqbalance
> >> > 599 rpc 15 0 600 600 524 S 0.0 0.1 0:22 0
> >> portmap
> >> > 618 rpcuser 25 0 720 720 644 S 0.0 0.1 0:00 0
> >> > rpc.statd
> >> > 629 root 15 0 400 400 344 S 0.0 0.0 0:18 0
> >> mdadm
> >> > 712 root 15 0 3160 3160 2024 S 0.0 0.6 3:22 1
> >> snmpd
> >> > 713 root 25 0 3160 3160 2024 S 0.0 0.6 0:00 0
> >> snmpd
> >> > 722 root 15 0 1576 1576 1324 S 0.0 0.3 4:58 1 sshd
> >> >
> >> > Anyone have any ideas. Literally the box is sitting there not doing
> >> > anything that has been scheduled.
> >> >
> >> > This happens occassionally then the load spontaneously goes down. Do
> >> > you reckon it has something to do with the raid 5?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> > Dan
> >> >
> >>
> >> ps auxw | grep " D "
> >>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I get the following:
> >
> > ps auxw | grep " D "
> > root 15802 0.0 0.1 3688 660 pts/0 S 16:06 0:00 grep D
> >
> > Dan
> >
>
> Then it's probably not a problem of waiting for IO.
>
> Here are the other codes, you might want to try S or T:
>
> PROCESS STATE CODES
> Here are the different values that the s, stat and state output specifiers
> (header "STAT" or "S") will display to describe the state of a process.
> D Uninterruptible sleep (usually IO)
> R Running or runnable (on run queue)
> S Interruptible sleep (waiting for an event to complete)
> T Stopped, either by a job control signal or because it is being traced.
> W paging (not valid since the 2.6.xx kernel)
> X dead (should never be seen)
> Z Defunct ("zombie") process, terminated but not reaped by its parent.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:19:45 -0400
> From: "Reuben D. Budiardja" <techlist at pathfinder.phys.utk.edu>
> Subject: Linux-NTFS Write Capability
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <200507191119.45373.techlist at pathfinder.phys.utk.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
> Hello,
> Does anyone know if the linux-ntfs module from linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net can
> write to NTFS partition ? I've tried to look through the website and even
> installed the module but still can't write to the NTFS partition.
>
> If not, what is my option to write to NTFS partition from FC 4 ? I am willing
> to take the risk. If the driver is just "good enough" or "mostly work", I'll
> try it out.
>
> Thanks for any info.
> RDB
>
> --
> Reuben D. Budiardja
> Dept. Physics and Astronomy
> University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:28:31 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Steven W. Orr" <steveo at syslang.net>
> Subject: Re: Finally .... Palm pilot now synchronises
> To: Sharon Kimble <skimble04 at gmail.com>
> Cc: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0507191126050.11242 at syslang.net>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
> On Tuesday, Jul 19th 2005 at 16:03 +0100, quoth Sharon Kimble:
>
> =>On 19/07/05, Christopher A. Williams <chrisw01 at comcast.net> wrote:
> =>> On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 03:31 -0400, fedora at jlee.fastmail.fm wrote:
> =>> > On Monday 18 July 2005 16:42, Sharon Kimble wrote:
> =>> >
> =>> > > I hope it helps others. Its a cobbling togethor of other folks ideas from
> =>> > > this list, but it works!
> =>> >
> =>> > Is it sync'ing using kpilot, gnome-pilot, or just pilot-link? I've been able
> =>> > to get pilot-link to sync for a while, but gnome-pilot and kpilot have been
> =>> > crashing.
> =>>
> =>> ...And after setting this up, gnome-pilot continues to die on my system.
> =>> These changes are convenient though in that:
> =>>
> =>> 1) They do set up permissions properly for syncing (solving a set of
> =>> udev issues)
> =>>
> =>> 2) Set up the /dev/pilot symlink to whatever ttyUSB port udev creates
> =>>
> =>> Since the default is point to /dev/pilot for syncing, this is a nice
> =>> little addition. I heard that the crashes in kpilot and gnome-pilot were
> =>> upstream bugs that are yet to be fixed. Anyone have status on these -
> =>> gnome-pilot in particular?
> =>>
> =>Chris.
> =>Another variable here is that I use kde from the kde-redhat
> =>repository, and I tend to install books to read on my palm by just
> =>doing a 'fast-sync'. Doing a 'full-sync' it does crash but I haven't
> =>worked out where and what the problem is yet.
> =>
> =>Sharon.
> =>
>
> As has been discussed on the jpilot list and also posted here:
>
> pilot-link is broken under FC4. The solution is to go with the pilot-link
> from FC3. Get the old rpms and install them. If you use jpilot
>
> rpm -ivh --force --relocate /usr=/opt/jpilot jpilot-0.99.7-2.i386.rpm \
> pilot-link-0.11.8-8.i386.rpm
>
>
> --
> Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0.
> happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ ..0
> Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all- 000
> individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
> steveo at syslang.net
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 08:32:14 -0700
> From: "Michael A. Peters" <mpeters at mac.com>
> Subject: Re: Linux-NTFS Write Capability
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1121787134.2907.2.camel at locolhost.localdomain>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 11:19 -0400, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Does anyone know if the linux-ntfs module from linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net can
> > write to NTFS partition ? I've tried to look through the website and even
> > installed the module but still can't write to the NTFS partition.
> >
> > If not, what is my option to write to NTFS partition from FC 4 ? I am willing
> > to take the risk. If the driver is just "good enough" or "mostly work", I'll
> > try it out.
>
> AFAIK the ntfs module can only write if the size of the file does not
> change, and it has to be compiled with that rather useless option.
>
> As far as writing to NTFS - I think the only option is through samba
> where the ntfs partition is smb shared from a windows host.
>
> There might be a commercial driver. I think I remember seeing one sold
> somewhere ...
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:45:38 -0400
> From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: SELinux update error
> To: Shane Lahey <s.lahey at nl.rogers.com>, For users of Fedora Core
> releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <42DD2022.4020605 at redhat.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Shane Lahey wrote:
>
> >Hello Steven,
> >
> >Monday, July 18, 2005, 8:26:42 PM, you wrote:
> >
> >SS> Todays FC4 update generated an error:
> >
> >SS> Updating : selinux-policy-targeted
> >SS> ######################### [1/6]
> >SS> sepol_genbools_array: unknown boolean user_ping
> >SS> /usr/sbin/load_policy: Warning! Error while setting booleans: Invalid
> >SS> argument
> >
> >SS> --
> >
> >SS> Steve
> >
> >
> >yes i got this error too, and was just about to post it. Anybody know
> >if there is any reason to worry about this error?
> >
> >
> >
> No, it is indicating a boolean that has been removed. This
> Warning/Error message has been fixed in the latest upstream
> load_policy code. user_ping boolean does not work in targeted policy,
> since the user is unconfined it makes no sense to be
> there.
>
>
> --
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:44:46 EDT
> From: RLLOYDNAVE123 at wmconnect.com
> Subject: addon applications with Fedora 4 - success and failure
> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <67.49186517.300e79ee at wmconnect.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I am searching for open source multimedia and 3-graphic tools and software
> development tools that will run with Fedora 4 linux.
>
> I have been seeing some apparent problems with applications that ran with
> older versions of Fedora that will no longer run with Fedora 4.
> The problem may be associated with using GCC 4.0 , although I am not sure.
>
> In any case here is a list of free applications that I have tried to install
> so far.
>
> Successes -
> Borland Java Builder - free version
> Audacity - sound editor
> Argo UML - universal model language tool
> Flight Gear - airplane simulator
> OpenScenegraph - 3-D graphics tool set
> SGI Performer - 3-D graphics - limited free demo version
> MainActor - video editor - limited free demo version
> xine - DVD player
>
> Failures -
> Blender 3-D editor - compiles but does not seem to work properly.
> Open Scene graph Editor - will not compile under GCC 4.0
> Virtual Terrain Builder - will not compile under GCC 4.0
> Timidity - Midi player - compiles but will not play midi files ,
> does not create timidity.cfg file.
> It appears that "sound fonts" are missing.
>
> Also the built in kmidi player does not generate any sound output.
> I have upgraded the Fedora kernel and installed the latest version of alsa,
> but it does not seem to fix the midi problem.
>
> Borland kylix - I have not had any success with this C++ development tool
> since I upgraded from Fedora1. There are rumors that Borland
> may release an upgrade to kylix , but the rumors may have no substance.
>
> Has any one had success with any of the applications listed above??
>
> So far the audacity sound editor is the only one that I have actually used
> for anything. It seems to work well and I would recommend it.
>
> I have had extensive difficulties with missing dependency libraries ,
> and incompatible versions that generate undefined linker and run time
> symbols. Overall there seems to be a lot of incompatibilities with
> source packages that were built for versions of linux other than Fedora 4.
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050719/23393a6b/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:44:01 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Drew from Zhrodague <drew at zhrodague.net>
> Subject: Re: IBM Blade Server HS20 with FC4
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0507191142170.32325 at auntie.zhrodague.net>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> >> We've got several IBM Blade Center Chassis, and HS20 blades in
> >> 'em. We're trying to install FC4 onto these things, but when we PXE boot,
> >> the things load the kernel, and instantly panics. Booting from CD has the
> >> same effect.
> >>
> >> We're using the kernel from the distro, and it doesn't matter if
> >> we do i386 or x86_64.
> >>
> >> I'd include a crash dump, but the wacky built-in management
> >> doesn't seem to allow that!
> >
> > Serial cable?
>
> Good idea on any other type of computer on the planet, except
> these. There's no place to plug it in!
>
> --
>
> Drew from Zhrodague
> drew at zhrodague.net
> http://www.WiFiMaps.com
> http://moblog.zhrodague.net
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:47:52 -0400
> From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: SELinux update error
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <42DD20A8.2020102 at redhat.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 21:01 -0230, Shane Lahey wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hello Steven,
> >>
> >>Monday, July 18, 2005, 8:26:42 PM, you wrote:
> >>
> >>SS> Todays FC4 update generated an error:
> >>
> >>SS> Updating : selinux-policy-targeted
> >>SS> ######################### [1/6]
> >>SS> sepol_genbools_array: unknown boolean user_ping
> >>SS> /usr/sbin/load_policy: Warning! Error while setting booleans: Invalid
> >>SS> argument
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >>yes i got this error too, and was just about to post it. Anybody know
> >>if there is any reason to worry about this error?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=163481
> >
> >The maintainer in his great wisdom had preferred to close it as NOTABUG
> >without providing a fixed rpm, so this PR has become hard to find for
> >users searching bugzilla ;)
> >
> >Ralf
> >
> >
> >
> >
> I have changed it to NextRelease if that will make you happier. It is a
> badly worded warning message.
>
> Dan
>
> --
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:56:53 -0400
> From: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Palm sync USB trouble FC3
> To: Fernando Fern?ndez Pedraza <fpedraza at gmail.com>,
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <6a2b366e050719085655e791f5 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Up to the latest kernel release (FC3), I have had fairly little
> trouble syncing my Palm devices using jpilot, although it was touch
> and go when udev came along. (Remind me why this was such a good
> idea?) I have never got the "advanced" kde/gnome/evolution working
> satisfactorily. YMMV.
>
> This is now Bugilla 163615 FWIW!
>
> -Martin
>
> On 7/19/05, Fernando Fern�ndez Pedraza <fpedraza at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello Martin, just a comment from another Fedora/Palm sufferer.
> >
> > It looks like support of Palm devices under Fedora is going to HECK.
> > I bought a Treo 600 while using FC4t3 and I have never been able to sync,
> > even with the released FC4. Many people report the same problem with this
> > and other handhelds
> >
> > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=159072)
> >
> > Do RedHat/Fedora developers hate Palm for some reason???
> >
> > On 7/19/05, Martin, AA6E <martin.ewing at gmail.com > wrote:
> > > After the recent update to kernel 2.6.12-1.1372_FC3, I am having
> > > trouble with Palm syncing via USB.
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ** las m�quinas son amigas **
>
>
> --
> martin.ewing at gmail.com
> http://blog.aa6e.net
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
> End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 17, Issue 230
> ********************************************
>
--
etudiant miagiste tel:9363020 !
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list