[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: FC3 crash with 2.6.12-1.1372_FC3smp



Am Do, den 21.07.2005 schrieb Daniel Vogel um 0:32:

Please don't post HTML formatted list mails.

> I got the same issue, problems after yum update...
> 
> The thing is, is it right to drop new files for upgrading when they
> have known problems?

It is certainly a good idea to exclude a package from being updated by
telling yum to do so (see exclude in man yum.conf), when you will be
affected by a known issue. Unfortunately sometimes this can't be
generally predicted.

> i was finishing instaling 2 machines (thanks god they were exactly the
> same configuration...), i upgraded one of them for the last 15 new
> packs and then KERNEL PANIC!...

Just boot the old kernel. Thats the reason why it stays on your system
and is not removed by a kernel update run.

> ...im going to suede my own luck because of that.
> 
> How sure can we be about all the things we'r upgrading are ok?

Follow the list and watch out for reports by other users. Check
bugzilla.redhat.com. Having a test system use the updates-testing period
to experiment with upcoming update packages and instantly report
problems if they occur.

> Daniel Vogel

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp 
Serendipity 01:08:20 up 5 days, 5:40, load average: 0.12, 0.19, 0.16 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]