Network subnet question

[Les Mikesell]

On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 07:23, Andy Pieters wrote:
> Hi 
> 
> On Tuesday 26 July 2005 14:18, Kai Zhang wrote:
> > No, 192.168.0.1 is on 192.168.0 network provided 255.255.255.0 as mask
> > 192.168.1.1 is on 192.168.1 network provided 255.255.255.0 as mask
> Thanks.
> 
> Does that mean that we would have to put a head on the server and change its 
> ip to 192.168.0.10 for example?

You can do that or you can assign an alias or interface on another
machine to be in the matching subnet (it doesn't hurt to have overlaid
subnets on the same wire) and ssh in to fix it.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell at gmail.com