yum - lack of features
Jeff Voskamp
javoskam at uwaterloo.ca
Tue Jun 28 19:21:46 UTC 2005
Paul Howarth wrote:
>On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 14:09 -0400, Jeff Voskamp wrote:
>
>
>>mnisay wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>True, but I was agreeing with the statement that `"yum install" was
>>>not a straightforward inverse of "yum remove"', which is true.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>The inverse of a "yum remove" may require specifying multiple
>>>>packages for a "yum install". Consider packages a, b, and c, where b
>>>>and c are dependent on a. "yum remove a" will remove all three
>>>>packages, and "yum install b c" would be needed to get them all back
>>>>again.
>>>>
>>>>Paul.
>>>>
>>>>
>>Consider what happens if part of /usr/lib/i18n disappears and I want to
>>get them back from glibc and glibc-common. The --force option on rpm is
>>about the only way to shoe-horn things back in.
>>
>>
>
>Does "rpm -Uvh --replacefiles --replacepkgs glibc*-blah.rpm" not do the
>job? Is --force *really* necessary?
>
>Paul.
>
>
From the man page:
--force
Same as using --replacepkgs, --replacefiles, and --oldpackage.
So for a package that's currently installed it's less typing.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list