FC2 EOL support concern

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am Di, den 15.03.2005 schrieb Marc M um 22:56:

> 5.  upgrade to whitebox linux which is a clone of RHEL3, which has
> plenty of rpms out there for it, and not worry about it until Oct.
> 2008.

a) Whitebox Linux seems to be a dead project to me. The main guy behind
it has turned over for CentOS.

b) Going from FC2 to RHEL3 (RH9 based) is a big step backwards, some
kind of a downgrade regarding software versions and kernel version.

If it is a server the OP might consider switching over to CentOS 4
(RHEL4 clone and FC3 based). He may too simply upgrade to FC3 and later
to FC4 ...

Alexander


-- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.10-1.770_FC2smp 
Serendipity 23:29:56 up 3 days, 2:03, load average: 0.10, 0.20, 0.82 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050315/5eb41444/attachment-0001.sig>