Antivirus in FC3?

[Craig White]

On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 11:07 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:

> On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 04:31, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
> > On 26 Mar 2005, at 01:09, Craig White wrote:
> > 
> > > Red Hat doesn't even distribute a Kerberos that really works with AD -
> > > so a full implementation isn't even possible at the present.
> > 
> > Windows implementation of Kerberos V is non-standard to the point that 
> > it adds some fields for carrying group information, and uses TCP 
> > instead of UDP transport (although it still supports UDP transport). 
> > Moreover, modifying a cryptoanalyzed protocol like Kerberos V in such a 
> > way doesn't mean automatically that Windows's Kerberos V modified 
> > implementation is also secure.
> > 
> > Thus, it's not Red Hat's fault.
> 
> Has Microsoft released the information needed to make an
> interoperable version?  If they haven't, getting it would
> be an interesting legal battle, given the antitrust settlement
> that says they have to share the information needed for
> interoperability (but not necessarily for free...).

----
of course they released it

I suppose it's easier conjecturing than spending a second and
googling...

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Microsoft+Kerberos
+documentation&btnG=Google+Search

first 2 links

Craig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050326/c190a2b0/attachment-0001.htm>