Fwd: [Contributors] Microsoft Windows Is Offically Broken

[Mike McCarty]

Tim wrote:
> Tim:
> 
> 
>>>A good GUI shouldn't need documentation, though; it should explain
>>>itself intuitively, and provide some hints for the more difficult
>>>bits.
> 
> 
> akonstam at trinity.edu
> 
> 
>>I have an ex-student who made a claim like this recently. His company
>>produces a product that needs no documentation. It is "intuitively
>>obvious" he says.
>>Balderdash. I am still waiting for the program that needs no
>>documentation.
> 
> 
> Then it's not a "good GUI".  :-\  I did say a good GUI shouldn't need
> it, I didn't say all GUIs are good.  A lot are quite crap, like the two
> examples I gave.

ANY significant system needs documentation. I take it that the only
good GUI is a trivial, useless one, then.

> On the other side of the coin, a lot of non-GUI programs are crap to use
> for similar reasons:  Unintuitive ways of working, requires
> documentation to understand how to use them, and the documentation is
> poor.

Nobody has said otherwise, AFAIK.

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!