[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: BUG: spinlock recursion



Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 07:46:50PM -0500, Bill Polhemus wrote:


[snip]

Posting HTML-only is patently ridiculous. Multipart is okay.

I'd say it isn't "patently ridiculous" (though I understand
why you used that term). IMO, multipart is NOT OK. HTML
is harmful in e-mail. For those who can't view it properly,
multipart lets them see what is there, true. But for those who
use readers which can interpret it, it is a security risk.

[snip]

You're not understanding the problem set of HTML-only. I suggest a web search.

I already gave him a start with a link.

Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]