Endian firewall Authentication
franklin dibus
franklinn2002 at gmail.com
Thu Aug 3 15:08:39 UTC 2006
Do somebody help me(with documents or ideas) in authentication on my
endian firewall 1.8?
I can' t use both Active directory and proxy local authentication
to authenticate my users.
2006/7/27, fedora-list-request at redhat.com <fedora-list-request at redhat.com>:
> Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
> fedora-list at redhat.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> fedora-list-request at redhat.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> fedora-list-owner at redhat.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: LDAP addressbook set up, now need to use it (Paul Howarth)
> 2. Re: Selinux woes (Paul Howarth)
> 3. Re: DNS Problem Maybe (Craig Preston)
> 4. Re: uname (Matthew Miller)
> 5. Re: Firefox closes without warning (Jonathan Underwood)
> 6. Re: uname (Kaushal Shriyan)
> 7. Re: Burning backup to dvd (Anne Wilson)
> 8. Re: Burning backup to dvd (Anne Wilson)
> 9. Re: uname (Matthew Miller)
> 10. Re: LDAP addressbook set up, now need to use it (Gary Stainburn)
> 11. Re: latest updates don't boot (Chip Old)
> 12. Re: ssh question (Bruno Wolff III)
> 13. Re: Burning backup to dvd (Dave M)
> 14. Re: Burning backup to dvd (Chong Yu Meng)
> 15. OT:Cybercafe Manager/Timer (sysadmin)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:02:58 +0100
> From: Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org>
> Subject: Re: LDAP addressbook set up, now need to use it
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <44C89D62.7010107 at city-fan.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Gary Stainburn wrote:
> > Hi folks.
> >
> > I've configured an LDAP addressbook using the openldap-servers rpm and the
> > tutorial at
> > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2003/03/27/ldap_ab.html
> >
> > The server's configured and appears to be working, however I can't seem to use
> > it.
> >
> > If I do a ldapsearch I see the two contacts I've added to the server.
> > I have configured the Kaddressbook to use the LDAP directory and it shows both
> > contacts and their details.
> >
> > However, in kmail composer when I click on Select the contacts are not there,
> > even when I choose the LDAP directory as the addressbook to use.
> >
> > When I try to use Outlook 2003 or Outlook Express I have the same problem in
> > that I don't see any contacts.
> >
> > Could anyone point me to any possible reasons for this, or how to fix it?
>
> slapd sends query details to syslog; add the following to
> /etc/syslog.conf to have ldap logs written to /var/log/ldaplogs:
>
> # slapd logs to local4
> local4.* /var/log/ldaplogs
>
> You'll be able to see what the clients are doing in the logs, which
> should help with debugging.
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:05:21 +0100
> From: Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org>
> Subject: Re: Selinux woes
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <44C89DF1.2050503 at city-fan.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Dan Track wrote:
> > On 7/27/06, Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org> wrote:
> >> Dan Track wrote:
> >> > On 7/27/06, Paul Howarth <paul at city-fan.org> wrote:
> >> >> Dan Track wrote:
> >> >> > Hi All
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I'm having trouble running software, especially the cgi scripts. I
> >> >> > keep getting the following denial messages:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > audit(1153994541.663:20): avc: denied { execute_no_trans } for
> >> >> > pid=9258 comm="httpd" name="status.cgi" dev=sda2 ino=19426
> >> >> > scontext=root:system_r:httpd_t tcontext=system_u:object_r:lib_t
> >> >> > tclass=file
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The files are located in /usr/lib/nagios/cgi/
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Could some please help me figure this out. I've started to read
> >> >> > through the selinux manual but its a huge climb and would appreciate
> >> >> > ways to solve the above.
> >> >>
> >> >> You should read "man httpd_selinux", which has notes on running CGI
> >> >> programs under SELinux.
> >> >>
> >> >> You generally need to set the SELinux context type of CGI programs to
> >> >> httpd_sys_script_exec_t:
> >> >>
> >> >> # chcon -R -t httpd_sys_script_exec_t /usr/lib/nagios/cgi
> >> >>
> >> >> Is this the nagios version in Fedora Extras? If it is, failure to work
> >> >> with SELinux enabled should be bugzilla-ed.
> >> >>
> >> >> Paul.
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> fedora-list mailing list
> >> >> fedora-list at redhat.com
> >> >> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >> >>
> >> > Hi Paul,
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the reply. I manged the above before I read you rmessage.
> >> > Thanks for the heads up though. Would you be able to help on the next
> >> > "search" error message.
> >>
> >> It's being denied access to search the /var/log directory to see what's
> >> in it.
> >>
> >> > Just to add this is a nagios install from source.
> >>
> >> Is there some particular reason you're not using the package in Extras,
> >> which *may* have solved these problems already?
> >>
> >
> > Hi Paul
> >
> > I downloaded the latest version from nagios. I didn't see the latest
> > version in the repository.
> >
> > Would you what command to run to fix this problem? I ran audit2allow
> > and inserted teh rules in local.te, and ran make. I restarted the
> > httpd, nagios and syslog daemons but still no joy.
>
> Here's now I approach these problems on FC5:
> http://www.city-fan.org/tips/BuildSeLinuxPolicyModules
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 21:20:33 +1000
> From: "Craig Preston" <duffman23 at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: DNS Problem Maybe
> To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <6842681b0607270420o1712989bi6b29ac50838d6419 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Thanks Tod,
>
> Setting the disableIPv6 to true allowed firefox to work. So then I set it
> back to false and changed my DSL modem dhcp settings to give out the ISP DNS
> rather than just itself. This seems to have fixed the firefox networking
> issues.
>
> thanks for the help
>
> Craig
>
> On 27/07/06, Tod Merley <todbot88 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/27/06, Craig Preston <duffman23 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I have a strange problem that seems to be DNS related. From a command
> > prompt I can ping an address, say www.google.com and I will get a reponse.
> > If I type a web address into the web browser (firefox) it can't resolve the
> > name and the connection times out. If I put the IP address in the web
> > browser it works and the web page is displayed. This also seems to affect
> > yum. If I do a yum update or whatever, it times out and cannot connect to
> > the update server.
> >
> > All my networking settings look correct, it is strange. Any help would be
> > appreciated.
> >
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list at redhat.com
> > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >
> >
> > Hi Craig!
> >
> > In Firefox do an "about:config" in the URL window. This will take you to
> > the internal Firefox configuration screen. In the "Filter" window type
> > "dns". You should see "network dns.disableIPv6 " as one of the parameters
> > found. Double click on the line to change the value to "True" and then see
> > if you can browse by URL name to Google and friends.
> >
> > If this works for you then look at "/etc/resolv.conf". If you are on a
> > DSL line with modem you may see "192.168.0.1" as one of the "namserver"(s)
> > in this file (at any rate, look for the IP of the DSL or other modem which I
> > am assumeing contains a nameserver as well). Comment out or remove this
> > line and then see if you can browse in Firefox with " dns.disableIPv6"
> > "False".
> >
> > If all of this hits, if you can, update the firmware on your modem. If
> > you cannot do that, then pray that my scripting skills sharpen and are put
> > to the task of editing dhclient.script so it can bypass the local modem's
> > nameserver.
> >
> > Good Hunting!
> >
> > Tod
> >
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list at redhat.com
> > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060727/17fc219a/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:21:27 -0400
> From: Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org>
> Subject: Re: uname
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <20060727112127.GA8430 at jadzia.bu.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 04:26:12PM +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> > I have a query on uname
> > 1)uname -i prints i386
> > 2)uname -m prints i686
> > whats the difference between this two and why is it printing differently
>
> -m, --machine
> print the machine hardware name
>
> -p, --processor
> print the processor type
>
> -i, --hardware-platform
> print the hardware platform
>
>
> --
> Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:21:54 +0100
> From: "Jonathan Underwood" <jonathan.underwood at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Firefox closes without warning
> To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <645d17210607270421i96094ban7579d7befde3f1d at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 26/07/06, Deepak Shrestha <d88pak at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to visit this site:
> > http://www.dluxproductions.com/webcandy/
> >
> > but before page loads, firefox closes without any notice. I can visit
> > this site from windows (firefox). I have latest firefox 1.5.04 & flash
> > installed and working perfectly with other flashed based sites. Is
> > there something wrong with fedora version or missing plugin?
>
> I see the same thing, FC-5, firefox 1.5.04. I suggest you file a
> bugzilla report.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:57:50 +0530
> From: "Kaushal Shriyan" <kaushalshriyan at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: uname
> To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <6b16fb4c0607270427m194bd5c8ted599d2cb85bc1bd at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 7/27/06, Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 04:26:12PM +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> > > I have a query on uname
> > > 1)uname -i prints i386
> > > 2)uname -m prints i686
> > > whats the difference between this two and why is it printing differently
> >
> > -m, --machine
> > print the machine hardware name
> >
> > -p, --processor
> > print the processor type
> >
> > -i, --hardware-platform
> > print the hardware platform
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
> > Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
> >
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list at redhat.com
> > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >
> Hi Matthew
>
> I know this using man uname
> My query is what is "the machine hardware" name and what is "the
> hardware platform
>
> can i have docs saying what is i386,i486,i586 and i686 architecture
>
> Thanks and Regards
>
> Kaushal
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:38:48 +0100
> From: Anne Wilson <cannewilson at tiscali.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: Burning backup to dvd
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <200607271238.48268.cannewilson at tiscali.co.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Thursday 27 July 2006 04:12, Tim wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:47 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > It looks as though the media was at least part of the problem.
> > > Changing to a different brand disk got me a complete burn, no error
> > > messages whatsoever. However, I find I cannot read the disk. It is
> > > not automounting. For a manual mount, is the type iso9660?
> >
> > It depends on how you created the disc. Have you tried udf as the type?
> >
> >
> That also returns 'No medium found'.
>
> Anne
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060727/247b1432/attachment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:42:22 +0100
> From: Anne Wilson <cannewilson at tiscali.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: Burning backup to dvd
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <200607271242.22829.cannewilson at tiscali.co.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On Thursday 27 July 2006 11:38, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Poohba wrote:
> > > growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/dvd=image.iso
> > >
> > > /dev/dvd should be the drive. mine is /dev/hdc and i just use that
> > > instead of symlink'n it
> > >
> > > growisofs -Z /dev/dvd -R -J /some/files
> > > works for me with no problem also. I have never tried to append. I
> > > missed a lot of your posts so I don't know what has already been tried.
> > > I apologize for any repeated information.
> > >
> > > gives what error? If it starts at all then the media is fine. If it
> > > fails immediately it could be the media unless the error is more
> > > specific.
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:13 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > >> On Wednesday 26 July 2006 17:00, Poohba wrote:
> > >>> Have you tried growisofs?
> > >>
> > >> Yes
> > >>
> >
> > This is a bad idea, you should ALWAYS burn DVD's with UDF only, burning
> > with ISO is a very bad idea, for instance, if you burn a file > 2GB on an
> > ISO, you will only be able to read the first 2GB of it. There are other
> > problems as well.
>
> OK, I'm struggling to find disks other than the brand that the burner is
> unhappy with - new supply coming tomorrow - but assuming I can find one, what
> command do you recommend to get the udf burn? I should also say that this
> burner is not so new, and on the same-model burner that I have used a lot I
> always use slow speed burning in k3b, so if it's possible to put a speed
> limiter in, I would prefer to.
>
> Anne
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060727/db307645/attachment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:49:19 -0400
> From: Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org>
> Subject: Re: uname
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <20060727114919.GA9618 at jadzia.bu.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 04:57:50PM +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
> > I know this using man uname
> > My query is what is "the machine hardware" name and what is "the
> > hardware platform
> > can i have docs saying what is i386,i486,i586 and i686 architecture
>
> What specifically do you want to know about them? Does
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/i686> and <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/i386>
> cover what you want to know?
>
> --
> Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:49:20 +0100
> From: Gary Stainburn <gary.stainburn at ringways.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: LDAP addressbook set up, now need to use it
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <200607271249.20535.gary.stainburn at ringways.co.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On Thursday 27 July 2006 12:02, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > Gary Stainburn wrote:
> > > Hi folks.
> > >
> > > I've configured an LDAP addressbook using the openldap-servers rpm and
> > > the tutorial at
> > > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2003/03/27/ldap_ab.html
> > >
> > > The server's configured and appears to be working, however I can't seem
> > > to use it.
> > >
> > > If I do a ldapsearch I see the two contacts I've added to the server.
> > > I have configured the Kaddressbook to use the LDAP directory and it shows
> > > both contacts and their details.
> > >
> > > However, in kmail composer when I click on Select the contacts are not
> > > there, even when I choose the LDAP directory as the addressbook to use.
> > >
> > > When I try to use Outlook 2003 or Outlook Express I have the same problem
> > > in that I don't see any contacts.
> > >
> > > Could anyone point me to any possible reasons for this, or how to fix it?
> >
> > slapd sends query details to syslog; add the following to
> > /etc/syslog.conf to have ldap logs written to /var/log/ldaplogs:
> >
> > # slapd logs to local4
> > local4.* /var/log/ldaplogs
> >
> > You'll be able to see what the clients are doing in the logs, which
> > should help with debugging.
> >
> > Paul.
>
> Thanks for this Paul. The problem appears to be with the applications
> themselves.
>
> Kaddressbook does a full search as soon as it starts and works.
>
> KMail doesn't even connect to the LDAP server, even when forced to used the
> LDAP service.
>
> Outlook Express only seems to do a search if you go into Address Book -> Find
> People. It doesn't seem to want to just pull in the list as Kaddressbook does
>
> Outlook 2002 looks like it wants to work properly, but refuses to set the
> search base and ignores the values I put into the search base field in the
> config window. It therefore doesn't recieve any hits.
>
> Kaddressbook
>
> Jul 27 12:43:51 stan slapd[3348]: conn=38 fd=11 ACCEPT from
> IP=10.1.1.115:57617 (IP=0.0.0.0:389)
> Jul 27 12:43:51 stan slapd[3348]: conn=38 op=0 BIND dn="" method=128
> Jul 27 12:43:51 stan slapd[3348]: conn=38 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text=
> Jul 27 12:43:51 stan slapd[3348]: conn=38 op=1 SRCH
> base="ou=addressbook,dc=example,dc=com" scope=1 deref=0
> filter="(objectClass=*)"
> Jul 27 12:43:51 stan slapd[3348]: conn=38 op=1 SRCH attr=l cn description
> facsimileTelephoneNumber sn displayName givenName jpegPhoto mail mobile o
> pager homePhone postalCode st street telephoneNumber title uid
> Jul 27 12:43:51 stan slapd[3348]: conn=38 op=1 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0
> nentries=3 text=
>
> kmail
>
> <Nothing>
>
> OE (after doing Find People)
>
> Jul 27 12:46:33 stan slapd[3348]: conn=39 fd=11 ACCEPT from IP=10.1.1.25:1475
> (IP=0.0.0.0:389)
> Jul 27 12:46:33 stan slapd[3348]: conn=39 op=0 BIND dn="" method=128
> Jul 27 12:46:33 stan slapd[3348]: conn=39 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text=
> Jul 27 12:46:33 stan slapd[3348]: conn=39 op=1 SRCH
> base="ou=addressbook,dc=example,dc=com" scope=2 deref=3 filter="(|(mail=jim*)
> (cn=jim*))"
> Jul 27 12:46:33 stan slapd[3348]: conn=39 op=1 SRCH attr=display-name cn
> commonName mail otherMailbox givenName sn surname st c co organizationName o
> ou organizationalUnitName URL homePhone facsimileTelephoneNumber
> otherFacsimileTelephoneNumber OfficeFax mobile otherPager OfficePager pager
> info title telephoneNumber l homePostalAddress postalAddress streetAddress
> street department comment postalCode physicalDeliveryOfficeName initials
> conferenceInformation userCertificate;binary userSMIMECertificate;binary
> labeledURI Manager Reports IPPhone
> Jul 27 12:46:33 stan slapd[3348]: conn=39 op=1 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0
> nentries=1 text=
> Jul 27 12:46:33 stan slapd[3348]: conn=39 op=2 UNBIND
> Jul 27 12:46:33 stan slapd[3348]: conn=39 fd=11 closed
>
> Outlook 2002
>
> Jul 27 12:47:29 stan slapd[3348]: conn=40 fd=11 ACCEPT from IP=10.2.9.4:1072
> (IP=0.0.0.0:389)
> Jul 27 12:47:29 stan slapd[3348]: conn=40 op=0 BIND dn="" method=128
> Jul 27 12:47:29 stan slapd[3348]: conn=40 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text=
> Jul 27 12:47:30 stan slapd[3348]: conn=40 op=1 SRCH base="" scope=0 deref=0
> filter="(objectClass=*)"
> Jul 27 12:47:30 stan slapd[3348]: conn=40 op=1 SRCH attr=objectClass
> supportedControl supportedCapabilities
> Jul 27 12:47:30 stan slapd[3348]: conn=40 op=1 SEARCH RESULT tag=101 err=0
> nentries=1 text=
> Jul 27 12:47:38 stan slapd[3348]: conn=40 op=2 UNBIND
> Jul 27 12:47:38 stan slapd[3348]: conn=40 fd=11 closed
> Jul 27 12:47:43 stan slapd[3348]: conn=41 fd=11 ACCEPT from IP=10.2.9.4:1073
> (IP=0.0.0.0:389)
> Jul 27 12:47:43 stan slapd[3348]: conn=41 op=0 BIND dn="" method=128
> Jul 27 12:47:43 stan slapd[3348]: conn=41 op=0 RESULT tag=97 err=0 text=
> Jul 27 12:48:12 stan slapd[3348]: conn=41 op=1 UNBIND
> Jul 27 12:48:12 stan slapd[3348]: conn=41 fd=11 closed
>
>
>
> --
> Gary Stainburn
>
> This email does not contain private or confidential material as it
> may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown
> and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:38:13 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Chip Old <fold at bcpl.net>
> Subject: Re: latest updates don't boot
> To: Fedora Users <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.62.0607270829220.21162 at mail>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:13 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> > I eventually got 2157 to boot by editing the init script in the initrd
> > image to utterly eradicate all references to the Windows XP raid that I
> > don't want to access from linux (but which linux insisted on trying to
> > access anyway). If you are actually trying to boot from a raid you need
> > to be able to access, the solution isn't as simple. My bugzillas with
> > more details about what I did are:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199793
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199831
> >
> > The bigger bugzilla that has lots of details is:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186842
>
> Thanks Tom. In this case FC5 is the only OS on the box, and we're booting
> from the raid array. Apparently Linux kernel 2.6.17.7 has just been
> released. This is a production box (one of our DNS servers) so rather
> than fool around with 2.6.17-1.2157_FC5smp any more I'll wait for the new
> kernel to show up in yum and see what happens with that.
>
> --
> Chip Old (Francis E. Old) E-Mail: fold at bcpl.net
> BCPL Network Administrator Phone: 410-887-6180
> BCPL.NET Internet Services Manager FAX: 410-887-2091
> 320 York Road
> Towson, MD 21204-5179 US
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:03:21 -0500
> From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno at wolff.to>
> Subject: Re: ssh question
> To: bruce <bedouglas at earthlink.net>
> Cc: 'For users of Fedora Core releases' <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <20060727130321.GA30131 at wolff.to>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 19:26:18 -0700,
> bruce <bedouglas at earthlink.net> wrote:
> > hi...
> >
> > research hasn't shown an answer... is there a way to do:
> >
> > ssh user/passwd at host
>
> As a side note, other processes on your machine can normally see your command
> line and so putting passwords on the command line when running any program
> is a bad idea if you don't trust all of the process running on your machine.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:48:37 -0400
> From: Dave M <DaveM at Mich.Com>
> Subject: Re: Burning backup to dvd
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <4.2.2.20060727084614.00dc6100 at pop.mich.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> At 07:42 AM 7/27/2006 , Anne wrote:
> >I should also say that this
> >burner is not so new, and on the same-model burner that I have used a lot
>
> Maybe you should try swapping drives between the box that works and the one
> that does not. Maybe it is a hardware problem or maybe the drives have
> different versions of firmware.
>
> -------------------------------
> Dave M
> Davem (at) Mich (dot) Com
> Ann Arbor, Mich. USA
>
> Endangered electronic species: http://www.eff.org/endangered/list.php
> "The 'Analog Holes' they want to stop up are our eyes, ears and mouths."
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 21:32:23 +0800
> From: Chong Yu Meng <chongym at cymulacrum.net>
> Subject: Re: Burning backup to dvd
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <1154007143.2794.7.camel at jadeblue.localdomain>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 12:38 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 July 2006 04:12, Tim wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:47 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> > > > It looks as though the media was at least part of the problem.
> > > > Changing to a different brand disk got me a complete burn, no error
> > > > messages whatsoever. However, I find I cannot read the disk. It is
> > > > not automounting. For a manual mount, is the type iso9660?
> > >
> > > It depends on how you created the disc. Have you tried udf as the type?
> > >
> > >
> > That also returns 'No medium found'.
>
> Hi Anne,
>
> I suspect that the problem may have nothing to do with the media or the
> way you are executing the growisofs or cdrecord commands. I encountered
> the same problems not too long ago, and it turned out to be my DVD drive
> that was causing all the problems. I hadn't used the drive in slightly
> over a year, and when I tried to burn a DVD on it a couple months ago, I
> was getting no medium found, insufficient space error messages, etc.
> Almost exactly the same problems you are facing now. I'm not sure if
> cleaning the drive is any good. As one list member suggested, as a last
> "test" I had taken a hammer to the drive, for wasting more than a week
> of my time, the last three DVD disks (coasters now) that I had, and
> worst of all, making me doubt the evidence of my eyes. Rather than carry
> on experimenting, I'd actually recommend that you buy a new drive -- it
> may save your sanity!
>
> --
> Pascal Chong
> email: chongym at cymulacrum.net
> web: http://cymulacrum.net
> pgp: http://cymulacrum.net/pgp/cymulacrum.asc
>
> "La science ne connaît pas de frontière parce que la connaissance
> appartient à l'humanité. et que c'est la flamme qui illumine le monde."
>
> -- Louis Pasteur
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20060727/074e8ae4/attachment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:38:04 +0300
> From: sysadmin <sysadmin at drc.co.ke>
> Subject: OT:Cybercafe Manager/Timer
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list at redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <44C8B3AC.3040304 at drc.co.ke>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi all.
> Kindly is there someone who knows where i can download cybercafe
> manager/timer that works in FC.?
> I have searched the net for the last two weeks with no luck. All that am
> getting are "M$ windoze" related/based..!
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
> End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 29, Issue 239
> ********************************************
>
--
etudiant miagiste tel:9363020 !
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list