Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption

[Mike McCarty]

Ingemar Nilsson wrote:
> Mike McCarty <mike.mccarty at sbcglobal.net> writes:
> 
> 
>>Mem:    248088k total,   242384k used,     5704k free,    10280k buffers
>>Swap:   524120k total,   221064k used,   303056k free,    41596k cached
>>
>>Only 5.7MB free.
> 
> 
> Actually, you have about 16 MB free, since the 10.2 MB in the buffers

Yes, I am aware of that. "Free" is a relative term.
I've written a few disc cache programs for embedded systems,
and one for MSDOS before it had one of its own.

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!