Automatic update
Kam Leo
kam.leo at gmail.com
Tue Feb 14 08:08:53 UTC 2006
On 2/13/06, Paul Michael Reilly <pmr at pajato.com> wrote:
> Anthony Messina <amessina at messinet.com> writes:
>
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00
> > autolearn=ham version=3.0.4
> >
> > Paul Michael Reilly wrote:
> > > One of the original reasons that I chose Redhat/Fedora was the ability
> ...
> > > Ubuntu is all about.
> > >
> > > -pmr
> > >
> > yum has a service for nightly update in fc4 (and maybe others). why
> > don't you edit the associated scripts to only download the packages, not
> > install them? that would be the identical behavior that ms allows, or
> > you could choose to have them automatically applied by just enabling the
> > current service. as another writer mentioned, you kernel is never
> > updated per se. the new one is just installed and /etc/grub.conf is
> > changed to boot into the new one, but your old kernel stays safe and sound.
>
> This looks quite adequate to meet my needs. Thanks for the tip.
>
> So one of my systems has the service and another does not. Hmmmmm. I
> drill into the issue further and it would appear that ATrpms provided
> yum for the non-yum service system. Grrrrrrrr. Fedora's own dll
> hell. And now it would appear that a total re-install would be
> required to undo the dependence that particular system has on the
> ATrpms packages. Live and learn. Whatever it was that convinced me
> to enable the ATrpms repo is long since forgotten, but I will never
> use the site again, but to meet an isolated and well defined need that
> cannot be met from a less intrusive packager.
>
> -pmr
>
I use the Smart Package Manager, http://labix.org/smart. It is very
good at sorting out conflicts between repos..
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list