Automatic update

[Christofer C. Bell]

On 2/12/06, Paul Michael Reilly <pmr at pajato.com> wrote:
> So my
> question is: why has the Redhat/Fedora update facility fallen into
> such disrepair?  And is there any reason to expect that it will become
> competitive with Microsoft's with FC5 and follow ons?.  It would be
> unfortunate to hear that the answer is Redhat Enterprise versions.  I
> don't mind paying but I do mind running stale software.  I'll pay
> gladly to live on the bleeding edge.  Even the lack of Firefox 1.5 with
> FC4 is disturbing, enough to make me wonder what all the fuss over
> Ubuntu is all about.

a.) It hasn't fallen into "such disrepair."
b.) If you think Fedora isn't "bleeding edge" then you shouldn't be
running Linux at all (it doesn't get much more "bleeding edge.")
c.) If your complaint is solely due to Firefox 1.5 not being out the
door on Fedora yet, go away and stop trolling.

--
Chris

"I trust the Democrats to take away my money, which I can afford.  I
trust the Republicans to take away my freedom, which I cannot."